Have you ever been to a meeting, where everyone in the room has good stats to share, but no one knows how to use them? I am sure, you have! Don’t worry, you are not alone and by end of this article, you will have some tips to make your analysis better.
In this article, I will challenge how analytics is being showcased during the cricket matches. While the display is a good way to evangelize use of analytics on grand scale, it is missing the very point it should be proving!
The message I want to leave through this article is far broader than just application to cricket. Example of cricket is being used only as a case study.
P.S. If you don’t follow cricket, you can still follow the article for the points I am trying to tell. Here is a beginner’s guide to Cricket.
Here is an example of what spectators glued to the screen would typically see at the start of the match:
There will be similar set of so called “insights” for the second team as well. The analysts performing this analysis have also attached probabilities with each event!
Here is a live example, which was shown in a recent match (South Africa vs. New Zealand):
These look good and exciting! What is the problem with this? Can you spot problems with these so called keys to success?
While these insights are good to see, they do not help the teams play better. Let me explain – an insight saying that team A wins 85% of matches when Player X scores more than 80 runs is useless to the team coach and the captain.
The team management would want analytics to do much more than just pulling out this insight and then praying that Player X has a good outing in every match!
If I was the analyst running this model – I would go further and say what is the best strategy to make sure Player X goes on to make a big score – Which position should he bat at? What kind of areas and which bowlers should he target? Which bowlers should he negotiate?
Let’s take another example – analysts have mapped out the strong zone and the weak zone for each batsman. You would think this is clearly actionable. The bowler just needs to ball in the right areas.
But it isn’t! Why? Strong zone and weak zone for a batsman would change from bowler to bowler, with different field settings and different whether conditions. It would also depend on the current form of both – the bowler and the batsman.
Other way to look at these insights is this – they have a lot of numbers and stats, but don’t really tell what they mean.
As shown already, the current level of analysis shown during cricket matches is rudimentary at best! There are tons of ways to improve this analysis. I’ll share a few high level thoughts, which, when implemented would surely provide better use of analytics:
There are many more ways to improve, but this should hopefully help you to understand what I mean by actionable insights.
The idea behind this article was to bring out some ways in which you can improve your analysis and to show case them through a real life case study. I have learnt some of these practices the hard way over time, but you don’t need to do that! A single minded focus on yielding actionable insights for your users can completely change the way analytics can add value to them. On the other hand, a sketchy job can lead to wrong outcomes and mis-guided views. All the best for the next piece of analysis you do.
Disclaimer: I have shared some of the gaps on the analysis showcased to the audience during recent cricket matches. I am sure individual teams in the tournament would be taking help of analysts for more sophisticated analysis. I do not have access to that analysis and hence do not know, how many of the shortcomings mentioned here get covered through those pieces of analytics.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,